<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 739 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786591</link>
    <description>An insolvency application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as within limitation because the filing fell within the Supreme Court&#039;s Covid-19 limitation extension, and the later failure of the award challenge further negatived any plea of staleness. A debt founded on the memorandum of understanding and supported by an arbitral award, which had been upheld in challenge proceedings and remained operative and executable, was treated as a financial debt. On that basis, the insolvency admission was sustained and no ground was found to interfere with the admission order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:13:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 739 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786591</link>
      <description>An insolvency application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as within limitation because the filing fell within the Supreme Court&#039;s Covid-19 limitation extension, and the later failure of the award challenge further negatived any plea of staleness. A debt founded on the memorandum of understanding and supported by an arbitral award, which had been upheld in challenge proceedings and remained operative and executable, was treated as a financial debt. On that basis, the insolvency admission was sustained and no ground was found to interfere with the admission order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>