<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 749 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786601</link>
    <description>Special leave petitions concerning seizure of gold and challenge to a show cause notice were dismissed after the Supreme Court found no infirmity in the impugned High Court order warranting interference. The Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the show cause notice, which is stated to be pending before the jurisdictional High Court, and left it open for that court to examine the issues raised without being influenced by the observations in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 749 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786601</link>
      <description>Special leave petitions concerning seizure of gold and challenge to a show cause notice were dismissed after the Supreme Court found no infirmity in the impugned High Court order warranting interference. The Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the show cause notice, which is stated to be pending before the jurisdictional High Court, and left it open for that court to examine the issues raised without being influenced by the observations in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>