<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 759 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786611</link>
    <description>ITAT examined whether long-term capital gains from sale of penny-scrip shares were genuine or taxable as unexplained credits under Section 68 and whether an estimated commission addition under Section 69C was sustainable. Applying documentary-evidence principles, the Tribunal found contract notes, demat entries, delivery records and bank receipts sufficiently established the genuineness of purchase and sale, and held that investigatory reports alleging market manipulation required direct linking evidence to the assessee which was absent. Consequentially the Tribunal deleted additions under Sections 68 and 69C and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:13:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 759 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786611</link>
      <description>ITAT examined whether long-term capital gains from sale of penny-scrip shares were genuine or taxable as unexplained credits under Section 68 and whether an estimated commission addition under Section 69C was sustainable. Applying documentary-evidence principles, the Tribunal found contract notes, demat entries, delivery records and bank receipts sufficiently established the genuineness of purchase and sale, and held that investigatory reports alleging market manipulation required direct linking evidence to the assessee which was absent. Consequentially the Tribunal deleted additions under Sections 68 and 69C and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>