<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 2048 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466631</link>
    <description>Tribunal refrained from deciding whether cenvat credit can be utilised where there is default in monthly payment under the challenged rule because a higher court has declared the rule ultra vires and an appeal is pending before the Supreme Court; accordingly the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after the Supreme Court pronounces on the issue, leaving all other issues open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 2048 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466631</link>
      <description>Tribunal refrained from deciding whether cenvat credit can be utilised where there is default in monthly payment under the challenged rule because a higher court has declared the rule ultra vires and an appeal is pending before the Supreme Court; accordingly the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after the Supreme Court pronounces on the issue, leaving all other issues open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>