<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1487 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466637</link>
    <description>Resolution Professional is authorised to verify occupancy and ownership status of units through factual inquiries and by seeking administrative assistance, including the Deputy Commissioner and police if necessary; such verification must be confined to determining occupational capacity and state of title facts and conducted civilly so as not to disturb bona fide allottees. Disputes of title arising from alleged multiple sales are not resolved by this process and remain for adjudication in the civil courts. The direction rejects appointment of a legal commissioner and requires the RP to perform limited factual verification without exclusion of the project from CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1487 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466637</link>
      <description>Resolution Professional is authorised to verify occupancy and ownership status of units through factual inquiries and by seeking administrative assistance, including the Deputy Commissioner and police if necessary; such verification must be confined to determining occupational capacity and state of title facts and conducted civilly so as not to disturb bona fide allottees. Disputes of title arising from alleged multiple sales are not resolved by this process and remain for adjudication in the civil courts. The direction rejects appointment of a legal commissioner and requires the RP to perform limited factual verification without exclusion of the project from CIRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>