<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 87 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50165</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q could not be sustained once the duty demand had been dropped by the adjudicating authority. The settled principle applied was that, in the absence of any surviving duty liability, the connected penalty had no independent basis and could not survive. The penalty was therefore set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 87 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50165</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q could not be sustained once the duty demand had been dropped by the adjudicating authority. The settled principle applied was that, in the absence of any surviving duty liability, the connected penalty had no independent basis and could not survive. The penalty was therefore set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>