<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>RECTIFICATION OF COMPANY’S NAME</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15882</link>
    <description>Section 16 provides that where a company&#039;s registered name is identical with or too nearly resembles a previously registered company&#039;s name or a registered trade mark, the Central Government may direct a name change, requiring an ordinary resolution and prescribed compliance; failing which the Central Government may allot a new name and the Registrar issue a fresh certificate. The High Court found the shared element &quot;REFEX&quot; to be prominent and identical in the competing names and treated the respondent&#039;s name as undesirable under the statutory test, setting aside the Regional Director&#039;s contrary order and directing name-rectification measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:30:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:30:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>RECTIFICATION OF COMPANY’S NAME</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15882</link>
      <description>Section 16 provides that where a company&#039;s registered name is identical with or too nearly resembles a previously registered company&#039;s name or a registered trade mark, the Central Government may direct a name change, requiring an ordinary resolution and prescribed compliance; failing which the Central Government may allot a new name and the Registrar issue a fresh certificate. The High Court found the shared element &quot;REFEX&quot; to be prominent and identical in the competing names and treated the respondent&#039;s name as undesirable under the statutory test, setting aside the Regional Director&#039;s contrary order and directing name-rectification measures.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:30:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>