https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50162 Recovery of a differential duty demand on IC engines was stayed pending appeal because the amount was said to involve inter-departmental Government funds and the concerned Ministries had not reached a final settlement. On those facts, coercive recovery was treated as unwarranted at that stage, and pre-deposit was effectively waived for interim protection. The Tribunal restrained realisation of the demand until final disposal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:05:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50162 Recovery of a differential duty demand on IC engines was stayed pending appeal because the amount was said to involve inter-departmental Government funds and the concerned Ministries had not reached a final settlement. On those facts, coercive recovery was treated as unwarranted at that stage, and pre-deposit was effectively waived for interim protection. The Tribunal restrained realisation of the demand until final disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50162