<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 662 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786514</link>
    <description>Presentation of a cheque within the proviso to Section 138 requires the cheque to have been capable of being honoured; where the bank&#039;s return memo records &#039;Funds Insufficient&#039; the statutory presumption of dishonour arises and the drawer must rebut that presumption, so claims that a cheque became invalid by reason of a bank merger/acquisition present disputed factual questions requiring evidence and trial; inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC is discretionary and ordinarily should not be used to decide such contested factual issues at the pre trial stage, and the quash applications were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 662 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786514</link>
      <description>Presentation of a cheque within the proviso to Section 138 requires the cheque to have been capable of being honoured; where the bank&#039;s return memo records &#039;Funds Insufficient&#039; the statutory presumption of dishonour arises and the drawer must rebut that presumption, so claims that a cheque became invalid by reason of a bank merger/acquisition present disputed factual questions requiring evidence and trial; inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC is discretionary and ordinarily should not be used to decide such contested factual issues at the pre trial stage, and the quash applications were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>