<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 675 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786527</link>
    <description>Admissibility of departmental statements recorded under Section 108 is clarified: where such statements are relied upon in adjudication, the adjudicating authority must, unless an exception under clause (a) of Section 138B(1) applies, first examine the maker as a witness and form a contemporaneous opinion that the statement should be admitted in the interests of justice, allowing cross-examination; failure to follow this mandatory procedure renders the statement inadmissible for imposing penalty. Applying that rule, a penalty based solely on a Section 108 statement without compliance with Section 138B(1)(b) cannot be sustained and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 16:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 675 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786527</link>
      <description>Admissibility of departmental statements recorded under Section 108 is clarified: where such statements are relied upon in adjudication, the adjudicating authority must, unless an exception under clause (a) of Section 138B(1) applies, first examine the maker as a witness and form a contemporaneous opinion that the statement should be admitted in the interests of justice, allowing cross-examination; failure to follow this mandatory procedure renders the statement inadmissible for imposing penalty. Applying that rule, a penalty based solely on a Section 108 statement without compliance with Section 138B(1)(b) cannot be sustained and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>