<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 688 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786540</link>
    <description>Where an assessee produces credible donor bank statements showing closure of fixed deposits, receipt of maturity proceeds and transfer to the assessee, the triple test of identity, genuineness and creditworthiness is satisfied and additions as unexplained investment cannot be sustained; the addition under Section 69 was deleted. Conversely, where bank credits from a relative are shown but the assessee fails to produce the relative&#039;s bank statements or other corroborative evidence to establish source or genuineness, the assessing authority&#039;s addition as unexplained income is justified; the addition under Section 69A was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:29:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 688 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786540</link>
      <description>Where an assessee produces credible donor bank statements showing closure of fixed deposits, receipt of maturity proceeds and transfer to the assessee, the triple test of identity, genuineness and creditworthiness is satisfied and additions as unexplained investment cannot be sustained; the addition under Section 69 was deleted. Conversely, where bank credits from a relative are shown but the assessee fails to produce the relative&#039;s bank statements or other corroborative evidence to establish source or genuineness, the assessing authority&#039;s addition as unexplained income is justified; the addition under Section 69A was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>