https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786566 Authority addressed admissibility of advance ruling requests and concluded that questions must concern supplies undertaken or proposed by the applicant within the statutory categories; queries about a tenant's activities or the applicability of precedents to another person's facts fall outside the applicant centric scope and are inadmissible. After providing an opportunity to be heard and noting absence of material altering admissibility, the Authority applied the statutory power to reject applications following examination and hearing and rejected the application accordingly. The ruling emphasises that binding effect of any advance ruling remains limited to the applicant itself. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:38:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786566 Authority addressed admissibility of advance ruling requests and concluded that questions must concern supplies undertaken or proposed by the applicant within the statutory categories; queries about a tenant's activities or the applicability of precedents to another person's facts fall outside the applicant centric scope and are inadmissible. After providing an opportunity to be heard and noting absence of material altering admissibility, the Authority applied the statutory power to reject applications following examination and hearing and rejected the application accordingly. The ruling emphasises that binding effect of any advance ruling remains limited to the applicant itself. Case-Laws GST Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786566