<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 128 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the demand for Customs duty against the Appellants. However, it agreed with the ld. Advocate that no penalty was imposable on the Appellants as there was no wilful mis-declaration or suppression of facts. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed and interest demanded, concluding the appeal in the specified terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:48:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 128 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the demand for Customs duty against the Appellants. However, it agreed with the ld. Advocate that no penalty was imposable on the Appellants as there was no wilful mis-declaration or suppression of facts. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed and interest demanded, concluding the appeal in the specified terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>