<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1777 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466590</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on GTA services was treated as admissible where goods were sold on FOR basis and the sale conditions remained undisturbed. The Tribunal applied settled precedent, including its earlier decisions and the Board circular noted in the record, and regarded the question as no longer res integra for the relevant period. On that reasoning, transportation service credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 19:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1777 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466590</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on GTA services was treated as admissible where goods were sold on FOR basis and the sale conditions remained undisturbed. The Tribunal applied settled precedent, including its earlier decisions and the Board circular noted in the record, and regarded the question as no longer res integra for the relevant period. On that reasoning, transportation service credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>