<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Benami transaction fiduciary exception: summary dismissal quashed and trial ordered to determine whether fiduciary trust or concealed benami.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96852</link>
    <description>A pleaded pre existing fiduciary relationship can fall within the statutory exception to benami prohibition, and whether a transaction is genuine fiduciary trust or a disguised benami is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence; summary dismissal at the plaint stage was inappropriate where issues had been framed and the onus to establish the statutory bar rested on the respondent. The trial court&#039;s reliance on the mere use of the word &quot;benami&quot; in pleadings to refuse adjudication was reversed; the impugned order is set aside and the matter returned for trial to decide the factual foundation of the fiduciary claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 14:09:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 14:09:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Benami transaction fiduciary exception: summary dismissal quashed and trial ordered to determine whether fiduciary trust or concealed benami.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96852</link>
      <description>A pleaded pre existing fiduciary relationship can fall within the statutory exception to benami prohibition, and whether a transaction is genuine fiduciary trust or a disguised benami is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence; summary dismissal at the plaint stage was inappropriate where issues had been framed and the onus to establish the statutory bar rested on the respondent. The trial court&#039;s reliance on the mere use of the word &quot;benami&quot; in pleadings to refuse adjudication was reversed; the impugned order is set aside and the matter returned for trial to decide the factual foundation of the fiduciary claim.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 14:09:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>