https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786458 Subsequent developments during the appeal rendered the dispute academic, so the Court declined to decide the larger question of law on restoration under Section 8(8) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. In that setting, it granted the practical relief sought by directing that the subject properties be treated as restored to the respondent and that possession be handed over, while keeping all rights and contentions open. The operative effect was a restoration order in favour of the respondent despite the unresolved legal question, with the appeal disposed of on the basis that no further adjudication was necessary. en-us Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:18:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786458 Subsequent developments during the appeal rendered the dispute academic, so the Court declined to decide the larger question of law on restoration under Section 8(8) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. In that setting, it granted the practical relief sought by directing that the subject properties be treated as restored to the respondent and that possession be handed over, while keeping all rights and contentions open. The operative effect was a restoration order in favour of the respondent despite the unresolved legal question, with the appeal disposed of on the basis that no further adjudication was necessary. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786458