https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786459 Provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was subsequently confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority, and statutory appellate remedies exist; therefore the challenge to the provisional attachment became academic and not amenable to fresh writ adjudication. Because confirmation occurred and no exceptional circumstances warranted bypassing the statutory scheme, the earlier Single Judge order quashing the provisional attachment was rendered unsustainable and has been set aside; the appeal is allowed. Parties are directed to pursue the pending statutory appellate remedies expeditiously, consistent with avoiding multiplicity of litigation and preserving public interest in attached assets. en-us Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:18:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786459 Provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was subsequently confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority, and statutory appellate remedies exist; therefore the challenge to the provisional attachment became academic and not amenable to fresh writ adjudication. Because confirmation occurred and no exceptional circumstances warranted bypassing the statutory scheme, the earlier Single Judge order quashing the provisional attachment was rendered unsustainable and has been set aside; the appeal is allowed. Parties are directed to pursue the pending statutory appellate remedies expeditiously, consistent with avoiding multiplicity of litigation and preserving public interest in attached assets. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786459