<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 629 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786481</link>
    <description>Deduction for donations to political parties under Section 80GGC cannot be rejected solely on generalized or third party search findings; revenue must produce primary, transaction specific evidence proving a direct nexus or refund/benefit to the particular donor, and absent such evidence the disallowance is deleted. Separately, a penalty imposed under Section 270A cannot be sustained where the underlying quantum addition has been deleted, because removal of the addition eliminates the foundation for a consequential penalty. Both the donation disallowance and the penalty were therefore set aside, restoring the claimed deduction and quashing the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 629 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786481</link>
      <description>Deduction for donations to political parties under Section 80GGC cannot be rejected solely on generalized or third party search findings; revenue must produce primary, transaction specific evidence proving a direct nexus or refund/benefit to the particular donor, and absent such evidence the disallowance is deleted. Separately, a penalty imposed under Section 270A cannot be sustained where the underlying quantum addition has been deleted, because removal of the addition eliminates the foundation for a consequential penalty. Both the donation disallowance and the penalty were therefore set aside, restoring the claimed deduction and quashing the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>