<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 653 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786505</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit requirement under GST cannot be waived merely because tax dues were paid during adjudication or on merits being arguable; merits cannot be invoked to avoid the statutory pre-deposit, and therefore no exemption was permitted. The petitioner&#039;s missed filing deadline and correspondence with authorities did not negate the deposit obligation. The court granted limited procedural relief: the petitioner was allowed two weeks to file the statutory appeal with the prescribed pre-deposit and a delay condonation application, and directed the appellate authority to sympathetically consider the delay and, if condoned, decide the appeal on merits within a reasonable time, preferably twelve weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 653 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786505</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit requirement under GST cannot be waived merely because tax dues were paid during adjudication or on merits being arguable; merits cannot be invoked to avoid the statutory pre-deposit, and therefore no exemption was permitted. The petitioner&#039;s missed filing deadline and correspondence with authorities did not negate the deposit obligation. The court granted limited procedural relief: the petitioner was allowed two weeks to file the statutory appeal with the prescribed pre-deposit and a delay condonation application, and directed the appellate authority to sympathetically consider the delay and, if condoned, decide the appeal on merits within a reasonable time, preferably twelve weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>