<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 658 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786510</link>
    <description>Uncontroverted pleadings may amount to an admission, and a general denial is insufficient to dispute a claimant&#039;s factual assertion; on that basis, the first claim was treated as payable. A bill verification process that proposes to reduce or reject a monetary claim must comply with natural justice by giving the claimant notice and a fair opportunity to respond; an ex parte report prepared without such participation was held unsustainable. The commentary also notes that where the claimant lacked effective control of the premises during occupation by protected persons and security personnel, later objections to actual occupancy carried less weight, leading to liquidation of the verified dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 658 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786510</link>
      <description>Uncontroverted pleadings may amount to an admission, and a general denial is insufficient to dispute a claimant&#039;s factual assertion; on that basis, the first claim was treated as payable. A bill verification process that proposes to reduce or reject a monetary claim must comply with natural justice by giving the claimant notice and a fair opportunity to respond; an ex parte report prepared without such participation was held unsustainable. The commentary also notes that where the claimant lacked effective control of the premises during occupation by protected persons and security personnel, later objections to actual occupancy carried less weight, leading to liquidation of the verified dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>