https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466584 Statutory functions performed by a university and fees collected for performing those functions constitute a taxable supply of services under the CGST framework; the petitioner produced no material to distinguish prior High Court decisions which answered the question against the petitioner, and therefore binding precedent governed the outcome, resulting in dismissal of the petition and leaving authorities free to proceed in accordance with law. The decision was rendered by the Madras HC and rests on adherence to existing rulings rather than fresh factual or legal distinction. en-us Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:18:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466584 Statutory functions performed by a university and fees collected for performing those functions constitute a taxable supply of services under the CGST framework; the petitioner produced no material to distinguish prior High Court decisions which answered the question against the petitioner, and therefore binding precedent governed the outcome, resulting in dismissal of the petition and leaving authorities free to proceed in accordance with law. The decision was rendered by the Madras HC and rests on adherence to existing rulings rather than fresh factual or legal distinction. Case-Laws GST Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466584