<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50134</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on parts, components and accessories of diesel generating sets used in the initial setting up of a captive power plant in the factory. Rule 57-T(7) allowed credit on specified duty paid capital goods used by a contractor or job-worker for initial setting up, renovation, modernisation or expansion on behalf of the manufacturer. The Tribunal held that the DG set installation formed part of the factory&#039;s power plant and that the component parts qualified as capital goods under Rule 57-Q. Credit could not be refused merely because the assembled DG sets had not independently discharged duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50134</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on parts, components and accessories of diesel generating sets used in the initial setting up of a captive power plant in the factory. Rule 57-T(7) allowed credit on specified duty paid capital goods used by a contractor or job-worker for initial setting up, renovation, modernisation or expansion on behalf of the manufacturer. The Tribunal held that the DG set installation formed part of the factory&#039;s power plant and that the component parts qualified as capital goods under Rule 57-Q. Credit could not be refused merely because the assembled DG sets had not independently discharged duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>