https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466549 Applications under the challenged provision sought to quash Section 138 prosecutions by asserting that a bank merger had rendered the cheques invalid; the court held that applicants failed to produce any material establishing the merger's legal effect and that the interlocutory challenge was therefore premature and liable to delay statutorily expedited cheque dishonour proceedings. The applications were dismissed as without merit, while the court permitted the defendants to raise and have the trial court examine any defence based on the alleged merger in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Feb 2026 19:01:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466549 Applications under the challenged provision sought to quash Section 138 prosecutions by asserting that a bank merger had rendered the cheques invalid; the court held that applicants failed to produce any material establishing the merger's legal effect and that the interlocutory challenge was therefore premature and liable to delay statutorily expedited cheque dishonour proceedings. The applications were dismissed as without merit, while the court permitted the defendants to raise and have the trial court examine any defence based on the alleged merger in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466549