<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1600 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466571</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction for assessing a business is governed by the place where business is carried on or the principal place of business, and a PAN address alone does not confer jurisdiction. An assessment completed by an officer who did not have jurisdiction and who did not issue a valid notice under the statutory scrutiny procedure was held void ab initio; consequence: the assessment order was quashed. Evidence of transfer of jurisdiction and consistent assessment history at the correct assessing office established the correct situs for assessment, and absence of any formal transfer order or delegated direction failed to vest jurisdiction in the officer who framed the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 17:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1600 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466571</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction for assessing a business is governed by the place where business is carried on or the principal place of business, and a PAN address alone does not confer jurisdiction. An assessment completed by an officer who did not have jurisdiction and who did not issue a valid notice under the statutory scrutiny procedure was held void ab initio; consequence: the assessment order was quashed. Evidence of transfer of jurisdiction and consistent assessment history at the correct assessing office established the correct situs for assessment, and absence of any formal transfer order or delegated direction failed to vest jurisdiction in the officer who framed the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>