<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 599 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786451</link>
    <description>An order passed without a valid signature is legally ineffective and cannot be sustained in rectification proceedings under the Income-tax Act. On the record before the Tribunal, the section 154 order bore the notation &quot;Signature invalid&quot; and no valid signed copy was available, so the rectification action was treated as having no legal efficacy. The impugned order was therefore quashed, and relief followed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 12:07:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 599 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786451</link>
      <description>An order passed without a valid signature is legally ineffective and cannot be sustained in rectification proceedings under the Income-tax Act. On the record before the Tribunal, the section 154 order bore the notation &quot;Signature invalid&quot; and no valid signed copy was available, so the rectification action was treated as having no legal efficacy. The impugned order was therefore quashed, and relief followed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>