<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revaluation of closing stock methodology defended; addition by AO set aside, valuation held reasonable and unjustified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96819</link>
    <description>Addition for revaluation of closing stock was contested on the ground that the assessee had previously provided for diminution in value of old/damaged stock and revalued closing stock for the year with a quantified reduction of Rs. 26,88,599, not the higher figure estimated by the AO; the Tribunal accepted the lower figure. The Tribunal found the valuation procedure-branch head physical verification, Director of Societies supervision, auditor approval-scientific and reasonable and, since audited books were not rejected under Section 145(3), held the AO&#039;s addition on stock valuation unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 10:29:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 10:29:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revaluation of closing stock methodology defended; addition by AO set aside, valuation held reasonable and unjustified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96819</link>
      <description>Addition for revaluation of closing stock was contested on the ground that the assessee had previously provided for diminution in value of old/damaged stock and revalued closing stock for the year with a quantified reduction of Rs. 26,88,599, not the higher figure estimated by the AO; the Tribunal accepted the lower figure. The Tribunal found the valuation procedure-branch head physical verification, Director of Societies supervision, auditor approval-scientific and reasonable and, since audited books were not rejected under Section 145(3), held the AO&#039;s addition on stock valuation unjustified.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 10:29:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>