<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 565 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786417</link>
    <description>Regulation 35 permits disclosure only of summary liquidation value to Committee of Creditors; the resolution professional therefore had no obligation to supply full valuation reports, and his actions complied with the Code. The appellant, who did not contest the liquidation value during CIRP, failed to show breach of natural justice or unfairness from denial of full reports; his claim of undervaluation is treated as an afterthought. A pending application seeking additional payment remains before the adjudicating authority and may be agitated there. The appellate tribunal found no error and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 565 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786417</link>
      <description>Regulation 35 permits disclosure only of summary liquidation value to Committee of Creditors; the resolution professional therefore had no obligation to supply full valuation reports, and his actions complied with the Code. The appellant, who did not contest the liquidation value during CIRP, failed to show breach of natural justice or unfairness from denial of full reports; his claim of undervaluation is treated as an afterthought. A pending application seeking additional payment remains before the adjudicating authority and may be agitated there. The appellate tribunal found no error and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>