<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 591 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786443</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail may be declined in a serious GST-linked fraud case where the accused is alleged to have acted as the principal operator of a bogus firm and the record shows repeated non-cooperation, failure to appear on summons, and absconding. The court treated the petitioner&#039;s evasive conduct as decisive, and held that parity with a co-accused who had cooperated was unavailable because the factual position was materially different. The principle that post-charge-sheet custody may not be necessary for a cooperative accused was found inapplicable on these facts. Pre-arrest protection was therefore refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:04:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 591 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786443</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail may be declined in a serious GST-linked fraud case where the accused is alleged to have acted as the principal operator of a bogus firm and the record shows repeated non-cooperation, failure to appear on summons, and absconding. The court treated the petitioner&#039;s evasive conduct as decisive, and held that parity with a co-accused who had cooperated was unavailable because the factual position was materially different. The principle that post-charge-sheet custody may not be necessary for a cooperative accused was found inapplicable on these facts. Pre-arrest protection was therefore refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>