https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786446 Quashing of an ex parte demand order was contested on grounds of breach of natural justice and limitation; the court accepted that a reply had been filed and that failure to attend personal hearing arose from adviser and staff defaults, and noted the petitioner's limitation plea. The court permitted conditional deposit of the challenged amount within four weeks; on deposit the petitioner must file written submissions and attend a personal hearing on the fixed date, whereupon the authority must pass a fresh reasoned order within four weeks. If adverse, the authority shall not apportion the deposited amount for two weeks from service of that order. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:04:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786446 Quashing of an ex parte demand order was contested on grounds of breach of natural justice and limitation; the court accepted that a reply had been filed and that failure to attend personal hearing arose from adviser and staff defaults, and noted the petitioner's limitation plea. The court permitted conditional deposit of the challenged amount within four weeks; on deposit the petitioner must file written submissions and attend a personal hearing on the fixed date, whereupon the authority must pass a fresh reasoned order within four weeks. If adverse, the authority shall not apportion the deposited amount for two weeks from service of that order. Case-Laws GST Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786446