<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 529 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786381</link>
    <description>Sale, marketing and distribution of lottery tickets do not attract service tax where the distributor&#039;s relationship with the State is principal to principal; there is no agency and no service rendered by the distributor to the State, so service tax is not leviable on those transactions. The reasoning rejects attempts to revise the Finance Act definition to create an agency relationship, applies the negative list exclusion for betting, gambling or lottery and treats the distributor transaction as a transaction in money or actionable claim. CESTAT Bangalore followed the Supreme Court ruling, set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:03:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 529 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786381</link>
      <description>Sale, marketing and distribution of lottery tickets do not attract service tax where the distributor&#039;s relationship with the State is principal to principal; there is no agency and no service rendered by the distributor to the State, so service tax is not leviable on those transactions. The reasoning rejects attempts to revise the Finance Act definition to create an agency relationship, applies the negative list exclusion for betting, gambling or lottery and treats the distributor transaction as a transaction in money or actionable claim. CESTAT Bangalore followed the Supreme Court ruling, set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>