<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 536 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786388</link>
    <description>Related party lending and receipt of loan proceeds justified admission of the insolvency application despite procedural lapses; because loan funds were indisputably received by the corporate debtor, the Adjudicating Authority rightly admitted the Section 7 petition and the appellate tribunal upheld that admission. Alleged related party interest disclosed in balance sheets and subsidiary links did not invalidate creditor status, so the challenge failed. Liquidation and e auction processes complied with the Code and Liquidation Rules, and no proven timeline or reserve price violation warranted interference, so liquidation was sustained. Exorbitant contractual interest was open to adjustment; the appeal against the impugned order was rejected as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 536 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786388</link>
      <description>Related party lending and receipt of loan proceeds justified admission of the insolvency application despite procedural lapses; because loan funds were indisputably received by the corporate debtor, the Adjudicating Authority rightly admitted the Section 7 petition and the appellate tribunal upheld that admission. Alleged related party interest disclosed in balance sheets and subsidiary links did not invalidate creditor status, so the challenge failed. Liquidation and e auction processes complied with the Code and Liquidation Rules, and no proven timeline or reserve price violation warranted interference, so liquidation was sustained. Exorbitant contractual interest was open to adjustment; the appeal against the impugned order was rejected as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>