<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 539 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786391</link>
    <description>An approved resolution plan that expressly extinguishes encumbrances, security interests and attachments over promoters&#039; and guarantors&#039; assets is binding on dissenting financial creditors. Where the plan settles claims and provides for release of covered assets, recovery or attachment proceedings inconsistent with that plan cannot continue in respect of the resolved debt. The tribunal held that restrictive observations limiting release only to mortgaged or specifically identified properties were contrary to the plan language and its finality, and set those observations aside while leaving the rest of the order intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 539 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786391</link>
      <description>An approved resolution plan that expressly extinguishes encumbrances, security interests and attachments over promoters&#039; and guarantors&#039; assets is binding on dissenting financial creditors. Where the plan settles claims and provides for release of covered assets, recovery or attachment proceedings inconsistent with that plan cannot continue in respect of the resolved debt. The tribunal held that restrictive observations limiting release only to mortgaged or specifically identified properties were contrary to the plan language and its finality, and set those observations aside while leaving the rest of the order intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>