<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 555 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786407</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment was challenged because the persons named in the reopening notice and order differed from those cited in the assessment additions; the mismatch meant the reassessment basis did not align with the basis of the addition. The tribunal treated this discrepancy as fatal to the assessment&#039;s validity and quashed the reassessment, resulting in allowance of the taxpayer&#039;s appeal and annulment of the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 555 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786407</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment was challenged because the persons named in the reopening notice and order differed from those cited in the assessment additions; the mismatch meant the reassessment basis did not align with the basis of the addition. The tribunal treated this discrepancy as fatal to the assessment&#039;s validity and quashed the reassessment, resulting in allowance of the taxpayer&#039;s appeal and annulment of the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>