https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466536 Bail applications under the P.M.L.A. require assessment of the accused's role, criminal antecedents, likelihood of tampering or re-offending, and mandatory statutory conditions for release; the court exercised its discretionary bail jurisdiction and rejected parity arguments because the petitioner's prior record and prima facie involvement-supported by statements recorded under the P.M.L.A.-distinguished him from co-accused who obtained bail. The court noted that admissibility of statements under Section 50 of the P.M.L.A. is settled law, and concluded that release would risk trial interference and further offences; accordingly bail was refused. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:02:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466536 Bail applications under the P.M.L.A. require assessment of the accused's role, criminal antecedents, likelihood of tampering or re-offending, and mandatory statutory conditions for release; the court exercised its discretionary bail jurisdiction and rejected parity arguments because the petitioner's prior record and prima facie involvement-supported by statements recorded under the P.M.L.A.-distinguished him from co-accused who obtained bail. The court noted that admissibility of statements under Section 50 of the P.M.L.A. is settled law, and concluded that release would risk trial interference and further offences; accordingly bail was refused. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466536