<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1772 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466537</link>
    <description>Corporate guarantor and co borrower status was central: the corporate guarantor had been held jointly liable where financial facilities defaulted and a Section 7 petition was admitted against the corporate debtor, producing insolvency proceedings; outcome-petitionary admission upheld and appeal rejected. Membership of the cooperative bank was contested but record showed the corporate debtor met membership requirements, so that objection failed. Invocation via a SARFAESI notice calling upon co borrowers and guarantors to pay was treated as effective notice of liability, and documentary suppression/fabrication allegations and admissibility of additional documents did not alter the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 20:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1772 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466537</link>
      <description>Corporate guarantor and co borrower status was central: the corporate guarantor had been held jointly liable where financial facilities defaulted and a Section 7 petition was admitted against the corporate debtor, producing insolvency proceedings; outcome-petitionary admission upheld and appeal rejected. Membership of the cooperative bank was contested but record showed the corporate debtor met membership requirements, so that objection failed. Invocation via a SARFAESI notice calling upon co borrowers and guarantors to pay was treated as effective notice of liability, and documentary suppression/fabrication allegations and admissibility of additional documents did not alter the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>