<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IRCTC scam case: Lalu, Tejashwi can&#039;t evade trial because of lack of sanction, CBI tells HC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=70982</link>
    <description>The prosecution argued that absence of prior official sanction did not bar framing of charges because a sanction can be obtained later without causing prejudice; sanction was in fact taken during pre-trial proceedings and defendants have not shown specific prejudice, while the question whether immunity from prosecution affects cognisance is a matter for trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 20:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 20:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IRCTC scam case: Lalu, Tejashwi can&#039;t evade trial because of lack of sanction, CBI tells HC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=70982</link>
      <description>The prosecution argued that absence of prior official sanction did not bar framing of charges because a sanction can be obtained later without causing prejudice; sanction was in fact taken during pre-trial proceedings and defendants have not shown specific prejudice, while the question whether immunity from prosecution affects cognisance is a matter for trial.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 20:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=70982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>