<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 114 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50105</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on molasses could be used for duty on sugar only if the credit was lawfully allowable under the scheme and consistent with the restrictions in Rules 57C and 57CC. Rule 57F(12) was treated as an enabling provision, not one that overrides the bar relating to exempt final products. On the facts noted, the assessee produced jurisdictional certificates and affidavits showing compliance with the prescribed Rule 57CC route, so the demand for reversal of credit was unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 114 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50105</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on molasses could be used for duty on sugar only if the credit was lawfully allowable under the scheme and consistent with the restrictions in Rules 57C and 57CC. Rule 57F(12) was treated as an enabling provision, not one that overrides the bar relating to exempt final products. On the facts noted, the assessee produced jurisdictional certificates and affidavits showing compliance with the prescribed Rule 57CC route, so the demand for reversal of credit was unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>