https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786320 Reversal of input credit under Rule 6 was contested on the basis that bagasse is non excisable; reliance on a departmental circular was undermined by its withdrawal. The tribunal applied the Supreme Court precedent holding bagasse non excisable and treated it as not a manufactured excisable product, resulting in denial of the department's demand for reversal of CENVAT/ input services credit. The lower authority's order demanding credit reversal was quashed and the appeal allowed, with consequential relief granted. en-us Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:36:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786320 Reversal of input credit under Rule 6 was contested on the basis that bagasse is non excisable; reliance on a departmental circular was undermined by its withdrawal. The tribunal applied the Supreme Court precedent holding bagasse non excisable and treated it as not a manufactured excisable product, resulting in denial of the department's demand for reversal of CENVAT/ input services credit. The lower authority's order demanding credit reversal was quashed and the appeal allowed, with consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786320