<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 104 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a valuation dispute, ruling that the appellant and buyer were not related persons under Section 4(4)(C) of the Act. Despite common partners, the absence of mutuality of interest or financial transactions between the parties led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that being directors of the buyer company did not establish a related person relationship and found no evidence to support the Revenue&#039;s claims. Citing previous case law, the Tribunal concluded that the appeal lacked merit and dismissed it, including cross objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 104 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a valuation dispute, ruling that the appellant and buyer were not related persons under Section 4(4)(C) of the Act. Despite common partners, the absence of mutuality of interest or financial transactions between the parties led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that being directors of the buyer company did not establish a related person relationship and found no evidence to support the Revenue&#039;s claims. Citing previous case law, the Tribunal concluded that the appeal lacked merit and dismissed it, including cross objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>