<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1743 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466519</link>
    <description>Benefit of administrative circulars applied: under the 1997 circular a subcontractor was not liable for service tax where the main consultant paid tax; the 23.08.2007 circular making subcontractors liable applies only prospectively, so demands before 23.08.2007 are unsustainable. Taxability follows the date of provision of service, not receipt of payment; services provided before 23.08.2007 remain outside liability even if paid later, subject to adjudication verification. Cenvat credit was wrongly denied: credit taken on service provider invoices is allowable and cannot be refused merely for omission of the provider&#039;s registration number when tax payment by the provider is not disputed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1743 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466519</link>
      <description>Benefit of administrative circulars applied: under the 1997 circular a subcontractor was not liable for service tax where the main consultant paid tax; the 23.08.2007 circular making subcontractors liable applies only prospectively, so demands before 23.08.2007 are unsustainable. Taxability follows the date of provision of service, not receipt of payment; services provided before 23.08.2007 remain outside liability even if paid later, subject to adjudication verification. Cenvat credit was wrongly denied: credit taken on service provider invoices is allowable and cannot be refused merely for omission of the provider&#039;s registration number when tax payment by the provider is not disputed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>