<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 96 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming repacking as manufacture and labeling as a treatment rendering goods marketable. The activities undertaken by the appellant were deemed not to amount to manufacture under chapter 33 of the tariff, as they did not enhance marketability and did not involve significant value addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 96 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming repacking as manufacture and labeling as a treatment rendering goods marketable. The activities undertaken by the appellant were deemed not to amount to manufacture under chapter 33 of the tariff, as they did not enhance marketability and did not involve significant value addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>