<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 80 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50077</link>
    <description>Physician&#039;s samples cleared free of cost were required to be valued by reference to the price of identical goods sold in the market, because the samples themselves were not sold and comparable sold goods were available. The cost-accounting argument was rejected as irrelevant where the comparable-goods method could be applied; it would arise only if that method were unavailable. The correct valuation basis was the sale price of identical goods, subject to any admissible discount deduction applicable to those goods, and the claim for a lower assessable value was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 80 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50077</link>
      <description>Physician&#039;s samples cleared free of cost were required to be valued by reference to the price of identical goods sold in the market, because the samples themselves were not sold and comparable sold goods were available. The cost-accounting argument was rejected as irrelevant where the comparable-goods method could be applied; it would arise only if that method were unavailable. The correct valuation basis was the sale price of identical goods, subject to any admissible discount deduction applicable to those goods, and the claim for a lower assessable value was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>