<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 90 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50073</link>
    <description>Specific classification under Section Note 2(a) of Section XVI governed the disputed machine parts, and the note was held to apply on the facts. The items were treated as distinct components within the tariff scheme, and their alleged special design for use in a particular machine did not take them outside the prescribed treatment where the note squarely covered them. The earlier Tribunal ruling relied on by the appellant was found inapplicable because it concerned different goods. The lower authorities&#039; classification was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 90 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50073</link>
      <description>Specific classification under Section Note 2(a) of Section XVI governed the disputed machine parts, and the note was held to apply on the facts. The items were treated as distinct components within the tariff scheme, and their alleged special design for use in a particular machine did not take them outside the prescribed treatment where the note squarely covered them. The earlier Tribunal ruling relied on by the appellant was found inapplicable because it concerned different goods. The lower authorities&#039; classification was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>