<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 166 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and quashed the notification discontinuing the levy of Anti-dumping duty on Iso-Butyl Benzene imported from China. It found that the Designated Authority and the Central Government did not adequately consider the threat of injury to the domestic industry as required by the Customs Tariff Act and Rules, emphasizing the need for a thorough review process and compliance with the Rules in determining injury to the domestic industry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 166 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and quashed the notification discontinuing the levy of Anti-dumping duty on Iso-Butyl Benzene imported from China. It found that the Designated Authority and the Central Government did not adequately consider the threat of injury to the domestic industry as required by the Customs Tariff Act and Rules, emphasizing the need for a thorough review process and compliance with the Rules in determining injury to the domestic industry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>