<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 434 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786239</link>
    <description>Whether service tax paid on deposit insurance premiums qualifies as an &quot;input service&quot; under the CENVAT Credit Rules was considered; deposit insurance is a statutory, mandatory component of banking and is integrally connected to taxable banking services, so the tax on such premiums is eligible for CENVAT credit. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on a Larger Bench CESTAT decision-affirmed by a High Court which rejected attempts to segregate deposit acceptance from allied banking services-was held correct. The Revenue&#039;s substantial questions of law are answered against it, and the appeals challenging allowance of credit were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 16:54:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 434 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786239</link>
      <description>Whether service tax paid on deposit insurance premiums qualifies as an &quot;input service&quot; under the CENVAT Credit Rules was considered; deposit insurance is a statutory, mandatory component of banking and is integrally connected to taxable banking services, so the tax on such premiums is eligible for CENVAT credit. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on a Larger Bench CESTAT decision-affirmed by a High Court which rejected attempts to segregate deposit acceptance from allied banking services-was held correct. The Revenue&#039;s substantial questions of law are answered against it, and the appeals challenging allowance of credit were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>