https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786247 A company was found to be fraudulently incorporated using a name strikingly similar to an existing corporate debtor, breaching the prohibition on confusingly similar names under the name-similarity test; registration of the respondent company is cancelled. The court relied on identical registered addresses, replicated letterhead and shared domain use to conclude bad faith, and ordered the bank to remit remaining funds in the fraudulently incorporated company's account to the petitioner's liquidation account. The Registrar's SPICe+ automated name-checking and officers' conduct will be further examined; the Registrar may file an additional affidavit within four weeks. en-us Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:46:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786247 A company was found to be fraudulently incorporated using a name strikingly similar to an existing corporate debtor, breaching the prohibition on confusingly similar names under the name-similarity test; registration of the respondent company is cancelled. The court relied on identical registered addresses, replicated letterhead and shared domain use to conclude bad faith, and ordered the bank to remit remaining funds in the fraudulently incorporated company's account to the petitioner's liquidation account. The Registrar's SPICe+ automated name-checking and officers' conduct will be further examined; the Registrar may file an additional affidavit within four weeks. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786247