<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TDS on service charges to Singapore affiliate: court quashes TDS default order, finds DTAA governs and AO(TDS) erred.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96758</link>
    <description>TDS on cross border service charges was examined as fees for technical services under the India-Singapore DTAA, which, if more beneficial, prevails and renders the impugned TDS liability unsustainable. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (TDS) may independently initiate proceedings treating a payer as an assessee in default, regardless of a concurrent scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3); such proceedings are separate and can impose interest and penalty. However, the AO(TDS) wrongly disregarded DTAA applicability and relied on invoice descriptions; consequently the order declaring the petitioner an assessee in default was quashed and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:46:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TDS on service charges to Singapore affiliate: court quashes TDS default order, finds DTAA governs and AO(TDS) erred.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96758</link>
      <description>TDS on cross border service charges was examined as fees for technical services under the India-Singapore DTAA, which, if more beneficial, prevails and renders the impugned TDS liability unsustainable. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (TDS) may independently initiate proceedings treating a payer as an assessee in default, regardless of a concurrent scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3); such proceedings are separate and can impose interest and penalty. However, the AO(TDS) wrongly disregarded DTAA applicability and relied on invoice descriptions; consequently the order declaring the petitioner an assessee in default was quashed and set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:46:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>