<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 133 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, who were involved in manufacturing gold chains and found with foreign marked gold and gold chains. The Customs alleged liability to confiscation under Section 123 of the Customs Act, but the appellants successfully demonstrated the lawful acquisition of the gold. The Tribunal set aside the confiscation orders and penalties, as the Customs failed to establish a reasonable belief for confiscation. The appellants&#039; appeals were allowed, and consequential reliefs were granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:14:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 133 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, who were involved in manufacturing gold chains and found with foreign marked gold and gold chains. The Customs alleged liability to confiscation under Section 123 of the Customs Act, but the appellants successfully demonstrated the lawful acquisition of the gold. The Tribunal set aside the confiscation orders and penalties, as the Customs failed to establish a reasonable belief for confiscation. The appellants&#039; appeals were allowed, and consequential reliefs were granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>