<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1373 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466456</link>
    <description>An assessing officer must record specific dissatisfaction with an assessee&#039;s claim before invoking the statutory disallowance mechanism for expenses relating to exempt income; absence of such recorded dissatisfaction invalidates the invocation of the disallowance rule. The officer rejected a taxpayer&#039;s suo moto 14A adjustment without referencing expenses or accounts and failed to deduct the taxpayer&#039;s offered suo moto disallowance from the rule based computation, resulting in a double addition. Because the officer acted on incorrect factual assumptions and without proper application of mind, the appellate authority disallowed the assessment additions and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 21:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1373 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466456</link>
      <description>An assessing officer must record specific dissatisfaction with an assessee&#039;s claim before invoking the statutory disallowance mechanism for expenses relating to exempt income; absence of such recorded dissatisfaction invalidates the invocation of the disallowance rule. The officer rejected a taxpayer&#039;s suo moto 14A adjustment without referencing expenses or accounts and failed to deduct the taxpayer&#039;s offered suo moto disallowance from the rule based computation, resulting in a double addition. Because the officer acted on incorrect factual assumptions and without proper application of mind, the appellate authority disallowed the assessment additions and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>