<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 178 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50056</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Court No. I, New Delhi held that the assessee, a small scale manufacturer, was not required to deposit surcharge collected as excise duty with the Central Government under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act. The Revenue failed to substantiate that the surcharge constituted excise duty, leading to the rejection of the appeal for lack of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:11:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 178 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50056</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Court No. I, New Delhi held that the assessee, a small scale manufacturer, was not required to deposit surcharge collected as excise duty with the Central Government under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act. The Revenue failed to substantiate that the surcharge constituted excise duty, leading to the rejection of the appeal for lack of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>